{"id":153448,"date":"2026-08-10T13:42:00","date_gmt":"2026-08-10T11:42:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.arjes.de\/?p=153448"},"modified":"2026-09-14T13:43:43","modified_gmt":"2026-09-14T11:43:43","slug":"mobile-or-stationary-shredder-comparing-flexibility-throughput-and-tco-correctly","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arjes.de\/en\/news\/mobile-or-stationary-shredder-comparing-flexibility-throughput-and-tco-correctly\/","title":{"rendered":"Mobile or stationary shredder? Comparing flexibility, throughput, and TCO correctly"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

In processing concepts, the fundamental question often arises as to whether a mobile or stationary shredding solution makes more economic sense. Both systems meet different operational requirements. While stationary solutions are designed for continuous throughput with a constant material flow, mobile shredders offer maximum flexibility for changing locations, varying material mixes, and temporary projects. <\/p>

This article explains how flexibility, throughput, and costs can be compared using a technically sound evaluation approach. The aim is to establish a comprehensible decision-making logic that leads to the most economical solution. It is based on the material, the location, and the planned mode of operation. <\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\"compaktor_300_waste_wood_11\"<\/figure><\/div>
\"Since<\/figure><\/div>
\"Even<\/figure><\/div>
\"Shredding<\/figure><\/div>\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/i>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/i>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Starting point: Price is not the only factor influencing the purchase decision<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

When making investment decisions relating to processing, a mobile shredder is evaluated as part of a process concept: feeding, material flow, separation, and logistics are all interlinked. The purchase price (CAPEX) is therefore only part of the picture. The decisive factors are how much usable output per hour is produced at stable operating costs and how much material changes, impurities, or short site deployments influence availability. <\/p>

For managing directors and plant managers, it is worth taking a look at the overall effect: if pre-shredding is possible directly at the point of origin, transport distances are shortened or trips are reduced. This can quickly make the difference between needing four trips of 35 km each per day or only two, with the same amount of material but a lower volume load. If you want to take a closer look at the general conditions, you can focus on typical scenarios from commercial waste recycling<\/a>. There, it becomes clear how much the material mix and operating concept influence economic efficiency. Such kilometers add up to OPEX over weeks. <\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Would you like some advice? ARJES offers state-of-the-art shredding solutions in both mobile and stationary versions. We can advise you on suitable machine designs and bespoke solutions. <\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tCONTACT US<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Evaluation logic: This is how the comparison becomes reliable<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

In order for flexibility, real throughput, and CAPEX\/OPEX to be truly reliable in comparison, a common evaluation logic with clear key figures is required. Three perspectives have proven themselves: technical parameters, operational constraints, and costs per ton. <\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Flexibility: Material mix, changeover, and tolerance to contaminants<\/strong><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/polygon><\/svg>\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\tRange of material flows (e.g., commercial waste, wood recycling, tires, scrap recycling).\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/polygon><\/svg>\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\tChangeover effort (tool or shaft change, adjustment of counter jaws, inlet geometry).\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/polygon><\/svg>\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\tTolerance to impurities (metal content, bulky fractions, varying moisture content).\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

At ARJES, adaptation to different material flows is conceptually designed using shaft types and adjustable counter jaws. In practice, it is less important whether a change is possible in principle, but rather how much downtime realistically occurs and whether changeovers can be scheduled into the course of a shift. <\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Throughput: Which factors determine the actual output<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Throughput is often understood as t\/h. However, the usable output is decisive for economic efficiency. The proportion that reaches the subsequent process steps in the desired quality is therefore the relevant reference value. Typical influencing factors are: <\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/polygon><\/svg>\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tFinal grain size or required particle sizes\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\tthe finer the desired discharge size is set, the greater the reduction in real throughput\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/polygon><\/svg>\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tMaterial density and structure\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\twood, rubber, mixed fractions, metal content\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/polygon><\/svg>\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tFeeding \t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\teven vs. intermittent, hopper design, conveyor technology\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/polygon><\/svg>\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tContaminants \t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\tsteel content in tires, foreign metals, long films, wire\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

A mobile shredder can score points if it runs stably with changing inputs and thus generates fewer unplanned stops. One hour of downtime usually has a greater impact on daily output than theoretical peak performance. <\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

CAPEX\/OPEX: Separate costs clearly and evaluate them over the entire service life<\/strong><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

CAPEX typically includes the machine, peripherals, and commissioning. Depending on the project, this may also include conveyor technology, magnetic separation, protection and enclosure solutions, and infrastructural adjustments at the site. <\/p>

OPEX includes energy (diesel or electricity), wear parts, maintenance, personnel, downtime, and logistics and disposal costs. Mobile applications in particular often have an additional logic: the machine travels to the material, not the other way around. If this eliminates six trips of 45 km each per week, that’s 270 km less, which has a direct impact on costs and capacities. Equally relevant are routes on site: an optimized layout can save 20 to 40 m of conveyor belt or reduce internal wheel loader distances by 200 to 400 m per hour. Such details become noticeable in OPEX over operating hours. <\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Direct comparison: operating models in the TCO check<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

The decision between \u201cmobile or stationary\u201d is rarely binary. Especially with changing material sources, from seasonal construction waste recycling<\/a> to constant packaging fractions such as paper recycling<\/a>, the economic advantage often only arises from the right mix of pre-shredding and downstream process steps. <\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t

Flexibility in comparison: locations, changeover times, material changes <\/h3><\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/i><\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/i><\/span>\n\t\t<\/span>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/summary>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Mobile systems play to their strengths when material sources change, space is limited, or processing is provided as a service at multiple locations. Stationary lines are advantageous when there is a constant input with clear specifications and a consistently defined output is required. <\/p>

In practice, flexibility is demonstrated by changeover time, the predictability of changeovers, and tolerance to changing input qualities. The decisive factor is whether material changes and contaminants only interrupt the process briefly or noticeably reduce availability over the shift. <\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/details>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t

Throughput comparison: stability, final grain size, and process reliability <\/h3><\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/i><\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/i><\/span>\n\t\t<\/span>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/summary>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Stationary systems often scale throughput via continuous feeding and coordinated line routing. Mobile shredders have to deal with fluctuating feed rates and varying input qualities more frequently. In return, they can pre-shred material directly at the point of origin, thus reducing the load on subsequent steps. <\/p>

The decisive factor is the economic throughput per shift. This results from a stable material flow, acceptable wear, and few interruptions due to contaminants or changeovers. If a process loses 30 minutes per shift due to contaminants, this adds up to 1 hour of downtime for two shifts per day. This time is missing from the output and directly impacts OPEX. <\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/details>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t

CAPEX\/OPEX comparison: investment, energy, wear, downtime <\/h3><\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/i><\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/i><\/span>\n\t\t<\/span>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/summary>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Stationary solutions often require more infrastructure (foundations, fixed conveyor routes, enclosure). Mobile systems shift part of the effort to logistics and deployment planning. In OPEX, the sum of energy per ton, wear costs per ton, and downtime costs per hour is often the deciding factor. <\/p>

For a reliable calculation, a TCO model over 3 to 5 years is recommended: allocate CAPEX to the expected annual volume, compare OPEX in \u20ac\/t, and apply a realistic availability rate. This will reveal whether the supposedly cheaper investment is outweighed by high OPEX. <\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/details>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Practical example tires: Why this fraction is technically challenging<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Tire streams are considered challenging because rubber is elastic and also contains steel components. The process must therefore cope with changing material behavior without disproportionate increases in wear or instability in the material flow. <\/p>

Typical technical challenges include steel belts and wire components, which affect tool geometry and material removal, as well as the desired particle size for downstream separation or granulation steps. Economic efficiency therefore depends not only on the shredding itself, but also on process stability: If pre-shredding is designed in such a way that subsequent separations run more smoothly, downtime across the entire line is reduced. <\/p>

The connection to ARJES is obvious, because we explicitly see material flows for tire recycling<\/a> as an application. The follow-up process is important for the design: desired particle size, intended metal separation, and consistency of input. <\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Decision matrix: Which priority suits which operation<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Clear prioritization helps with quick preselection. The following key questions put flexibility, throughput, and costs in a verifiable order: <\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/polygon><\/svg>\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\tHow much does the material mix fluctuate over the week and month?\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/polygon><\/svg>\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\tWhat annual volume is to be processed, and how many shifts are planned?\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/polygon><\/svg>\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\tWhat logistics routes are currently involved (e.g., 20 to 60 km per tour), and how do they change with on-site pre-shredding?\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/polygon><\/svg>\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\tWhat downtimes are tolerable, and what service windows are realistic?\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/polygon><\/svg>\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\tWhich cost item dominates in the operation: energy, wear and tear, personnel, or logistics?\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Those with high material variance prioritize flexibility and predictable changeovers. Those who consistently process large quantities prioritize stable throughput and process reliability. Those who are strongly OPEX-driven prioritize energy per ton, wear per ton, and availability. <\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"EKOMAXX\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

ARJES in context: Selection paths for mobile shredding<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

ARJES develops and manufactures recycling machines, in particular slow-running twin-shaft shredders. Two paths are helpful for internal orientation when classifying the portfolio: <\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/polygon><\/svg>\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\tFor mobile applications with moderate use, it is worth taking a look at the COMPAKTOR series.\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/polygon><\/svg>\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\tFor an optimal cost-benefit ratio in the field of composting and wood processing plants as well as in the processing of commercial waste, the EKOMAXX line is recommended.\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/polygon><\/svg>\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf higher performance requirements and robust material flows are the focus, the TITAN product line is a relevant point of comparison.\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

The project logic of material mix, final grain size, and application profile is important for making the right economic choice.<\/p>

The quickest way to determine whether the COMPAKTOR, EKOMAXX, or TITAN line is the right fit is to talk to us. Let us advise you<\/a> on the right solution for your material, location, and TCO.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Make an economical decision, compare technically clean<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

The best economic decision is made when material, final grain size, location, and mode of operation are considered together. A mobile shredder not only affects throughput, but also logistics, availability, and cost per ton. Those who consistently combine flexibility, real output, and CAPEX\/OPEX in the TCO model will quickly recognize which solution is right for their own operation. <\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

FAQ: Mobile shredder in the economic efficiency assessment\n\n<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

A short FAQ section clarifies typical decision-making questions before comparing offers.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t

When is a mobile shredder economically viable? <\/h3><\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/i><\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/i><\/span>\n\t\t<\/span>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/summary>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

A mobile shredder is worthwhile when material sources change or pre-shredding reduces transport and downtime. The decisive factors are fewer kilometers per trip, stable output per shift, and OPEX per ton compared to the stationary alternative. <\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/details>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t

Which key figures are important for the TCO comparison? <\/h3><\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/i><\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/i><\/span>\n\t\t<\/span>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/summary>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

CAPEX, energy per ton, wear costs per ton, availability, and downtime costs per hour are important for TCO. In addition, information on the final grain size, feed rate, and planned annual volume help to make comparisons reliable. <\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/details>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t

How does the desired target grain size influence the actual throughput? <\/h3><\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/i><\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/i><\/span>\n\t\t<\/span>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/summary>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

The smaller the required particle size, the greater the reduction in the actual achievable throughput. In addition, wear and energy consumption per ton often increase. Therefore, the target grain size should always be defined in line with the subsequent process. <\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/details>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t

Why are tire streams particularly challenging from a technical perspective? <\/h3><\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/i><\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/i><\/span>\n\t\t<\/span>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/summary>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Tires contain elastic rubber and steel components, which affect material flow and tool wear load. Process stability, predictable wear, and an output that reliably supplies downstream separation processes without frequent stops are important for economic efficiency. <\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/details>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t

Which OPEX drivers are often underestimated in projects? <\/h3><\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/i><\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/i><\/span>\n\t\t<\/span>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/summary>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Downtime, internal logistics routes on site, and wear costs per ton with changing material mixes are often underestimated. Additional trips of 20 to 60 km per tour can quickly have a greater impact than small differences in purchase price. <\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/details>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t

How does ARJES provide support in design and project clarification? <\/h3><\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/i><\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/i><\/span>\n\t\t<\/span>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/summary>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

For projects, it is crucial to clarify the material mix, required final grain size, and follow-up process at an early stage and to plan suitable settings and components. For a concrete assessment of boundary conditions and application scenarios, it is worth contacting us directly via the contact page<\/a>. <\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/details>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In processing concepts, the fundamental question often arises as to whether a mobile or stationary shredding solution makes more economic sense. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":124260,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_titles_title":"Comparing mobile shredders: Understanding CAPEX\/OPEX","_seopress_titles_desc":"Evaluating mobile shredders correctly \u2705 Classifying flexibility & throughput \u2705 Comparing CAPEX\/OPEX as TCO \u279c Get advice now.","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"both","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":301,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_seopress_news_disabled":"","_seopress_video_disabled":"","_seopress_video":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas_manual":[],"_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable_all":"","_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[193,77],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-153448","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-article","category-fachartikel"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arjes.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153448","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arjes.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arjes.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arjes.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arjes.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=153448"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arjes.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153448\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":153479,"href":"https:\/\/www.arjes.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153448\/revisions\/153479"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arjes.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/124260"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arjes.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=153448"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arjes.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=153448"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arjes.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=153448"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}